Rosenblatt
  • About
    • Memery Crystal
    • Investors
  • Services

    Services

    Rosenblatt is a disputes powerhouse. Competitive in the best sense, our teams provide incisive specialist expertise and collaborate closely with one another to meet our clients’ needs across the full spectrum of their activities.

    • Dispute Resolution
    • Construction, Engineering and Energy
    • Corporate Investigations
    • Debt Recovery
    • DLT, Digital Assets, and Tokenisation
    • Financial Crime
    • Financial Services
    • Insolvency & Financial Restructuring
    • International Arbitration
    • Probate & Wills
    • Serious & General Crime
    • Tax
    • Non-Contentious & Advisory
  • Insight
  • Events
  • Group Litigation
    • Amazon Legal Action
    • Property Investment Scheme Claims
    • Apple Class Action
  • Contact

Do We Need a Specialist Block Exemption to Cover the Distribution of Motor Vehicles in the EU?

19th October 2020

Introduction

On 12 October 2020, the European Commission announced a public consultation in relation to the review of competition legislation which governs the distribution of the sale and repair of motor vehicles and the distribution of spare parts in the European Union.

The review will look into whether the terms of Commission Regulation 461/2010 (“the Motor Vehicle Block Exemption” or” MVBE”) and accompanying Guidelines on vertical restraints in agreements for the sale and repair of motor vehicles and for the distribution of spare parts (“the Guidelines”) still remain appropriate and effective or whether these specialist rules can be submerged into the general vertical agreements block exemption ,Regulation 330/2010 (“VABE”).  The terms of the VABE is also up for review

Regulation 461/2010 expires on 31 May 2023 and requires the Commission to draw up an evaluation report on its operation by 31 May 2021.

Background

Under the EU competition rules (Art. 101(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (“the Treaty”) there is a general prohibition of anticompetitive agreements between undertakings which appreciably affect trade and competition in the Community.  However, under the conditions contained in Art. 101(3) of the Treaty they may be granted an individual exemption if they meet the requirements of the legislation and in particular promote efficiencies and allow consumers a fair share of the resulting benefits.

In addition to individual exemptions the Commission is empowered by Council Regulation (EEC) 19/65 to apply Art. 101(3) of the Treaty by regulation to certain categories of vertical agreements and corresponding concerted practices falling within Art. 101(1) of the Treaty provided they satisfy the conditions of  Art. 101(3) of the Treaty.

The Commission has made use of this power to exempt certain types of motor vehicle distribution and after-sales agreements by virtue of the MVBE. The Commission has also adopted a Notice providing guidance on the interpretation of this Regulation entitled “Supplementary guidelines on vertical restraints in agreements for the sale and repair of motor vehicles and for the distribution of spare parts for motor vehicles” referred to above as “the Guidelines.”

The Commission has to draw up an evaluation report on its operation by 31 May 2021. The purpose of the Commission’s evaluation of the MVBE and the Guidelines was to gather facts and evidence on how well the legislation was working. Also, as part their review is a consideration of the application of another block exemption, Commission Regulation 330/2010 (“VABE”), which applies generally to vertical agreements but can also apply to the motor vehicle sector.

So, one central question for the review is whether there is a need for a specific MVBE and/or Guidelines or whether it would be sufficient to cover the distribution of motor vehicles under the VABE. There is a number of precedents for the Commission withdrawing specialist problem exemptions. The latest example was the removal of the specialist Insurance Block Exemption several years ago when it came up for review.

The Consultation

The consultation is designed to gather facts and evidence relating to industry practices, perceptions of stakeholders and possible cost savings from various types of stakeholders in order to assess whether and to what extent the objectives of the MVBE are fulfilled. This would allow the Commission to form a comprehensive picture of the Regulation’s effectiveness and efficiency.

By allowing interested parties to provide feedback and contribute their suggestions the Commission believes it will contribute to transparency and the accountability of the evaluation process.

According to the Commission the main stakeholder groups to which the consultation is relevant are as follows:

(i) undertakings with business operations in the EU motor vehicle sector, notably vehicle manufacturers and dealers, spare parts manufacturers and distributors (authorised and independent), and repairers (authorised and independent).

(ii) trade associations representing the interests of the above;

(iii) consumer organisations; and

(iv) academics with a focus on EU competition law and notably on the motor vehicle sector.

However, notwithstanding the above list, the consultation is open to any other stakeholder with a possible interest in the legislation.

According to the Commission’s questionnaire which form the basis for the Consultation they are seeking answers to a number of questions on the review criteria especially effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence and whether it contributes added value to the relevant markets in the EU.

The consultation asks:

  • Whether competition in new motor vehicle distribution, repair and maintenance services, and distribution of spare parts has intensified, weakened, or stayed the same since 2010.
  • Whether the scope of the block exemption (particularly 30% market share threshold and list of hardcore restrictions) is still appropriate and effective.
  • Whether the objectives of the block exemption (in terms of promotion of competition and removal of restrictions) and the prevalence in practice of the different types of restrictions referred to in the motor vehicle block exemption rules (including whether any indirect means of achieving anti-competitive results have been encountered).
  • Whether the block exemption (including definitions and particular provisions) has provided clarity and increased legal certainty as to the applicable rules.
  • What costs have been incurred in complying with the block exemption and whether these have been proportionate to any resultant benefits.
  • Whether the objectives of the rules remain relevant, with regard to any changes in the market.
  • Whether the motor vehicle block is consistent with the verticals block exemption and other EU rules.
  • Whether the motor vehicle block exemption rules have made it easier for national authorities and courts to apply the rules or whether national rules could have been equally effective.

A copy of the Commission’s consultation and associated questionnaire can be accessed at:
https://ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/motor_vehicles/legislation/mvber_review.html

Post navigation

COVID-19 | Alert Level System
I. Stephanie Boyce: Vice President of the Law Society joins Rosenblatt for a Q&A on diversity and inclusion

Categories

  • Articles
  • News
  • Videos

Topics

  • Banking & Finance
  • Competition & Regulatory
  • Corporate
  • Dispute Resolution
  • DLT, Cryptocurrencies and Crypto Assets
  • Employment
  • Financial Crime
  • Financial Services
  • Insolvency & Financial Restructuring
  • International Arbitration
  • Investigations
  • IP/Technology/Media
  • Real Estate
  • Tax
Rosenblatt
  • +44 (0) 20 7955 0880
  • info@rosenblatt-law.co.uk

Helpful Links

  • Anti-Modern Slavery Statement
  • Complaints Policy
  • Diversity & Equality
  • Interest
  • Pricing
  • Subscribe to our Mailing List

SRA No. 820215, authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Ce Logo
Uk Top Tier Firm 2026

Rosenblatt is a trading name of RBG Legal Services Limited, a company registered in England and Wales (with company number 13287062) and which is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under SRA No. 820215. A list of the directors of RBG Legal Services Limited, together with a list of those persons who are designated as partners of Rosenblatt, is available for inspection at the registered office of the company at 165 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2DY.

Rosenblatt uses the word “partner” to refer to a senior employee or consultant. However, Rosenblatt is not a partnership and the use of the term “partner” does not create or imply a partnership amongst or between any of its employees or consultants.

© 2025 Rosenblatt

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Website by Brighter*IR

link

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in .

Rosenblatt
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookies should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

Performance cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site.

Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!

Cookie Policy

More information about our Cookie Policy.