Rosenblatt
  • About
    • Memery Crystal
    • Investors
  • Services

    Services

    Rosenblatt is a disputes powerhouse. Competitive in the best sense, our teams provide incisive specialist expertise and collaborate closely with one another to meet our clients’ needs across the full spectrum of their activities.

    • Dispute Resolution
    • Construction, Engineering and Energy
    • Corporate Investigations
    • Debt Recovery
    • DLT, Digital Assets, and Tokenisation
    • Financial Crime
    • Financial Services
    • Insolvency & Financial Restructuring
    • International Arbitration
    • Probate & Wills
    • Serious & General Crime
    • Tax
    • Non-Contentious & Advisory
  • Insight
  • Events
  • Group Litigation
    • Amazon Legal Action
    • Property Investment Scheme Claims
    • Apple Class Action
  • Contact

HMRC | Cash Detention Application Dismissed | Rosenblatt’s Financial Crime Team

1st July 2021

Rosenblatt were instructed on behalf of the respondent at the Magistrates’ Court. On 20 April 2021 the Appeal Court upheld an earlier Court’s decision to dismiss HM Revenue & Customs’ (HMRC) application for an extension of cash detention beyond the expiration of the first 6 months. The Court held that as the application was heard after the expiration of the initial 6 month’s detention an extension could not be granted despite the delay being caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

HMRC Investigations | Rosenblatt’s Financial Crime Team

The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 entitles investigators to seize cash where the amount is in excess of £1,000 and, they believe that such cash represents the proceeds of crime; or that it is intended for use by any person in the pursuit of unlawful conduct.

The seized cash may be retained for an initial 48-hour period within which time an application must be made by the prosecuting authority to the Magistrates’ Court for the continued detention for a further 6-months. Thereafter, further extensions to the earlier Court Order can be made for a period of up to 2 years from the date the initial order was obtained.

In March 2020 we saw the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic which forced the UK into a national lockdown. As a result, thousands of Court listings and hearings were postponed.

In this case, HMRC v Mann, HMRC filed their application for an extension of the original order on 26 March 2020. Between 26 March and 2 April 2020, HMRC made numerous requests to arrange for their application for the further detention of cash to be listed prior to the expiration of the 6-month period, (being 3 April 2020) but the Court failed to do so.

HMRC’s application was then listed for a remote telephone hearing on 28 April 2020 which was adjourned and relisted for 22 June 2020. We represented Mr Mann when the District Judge handed down Judgment on 1 July 2020 which was subsequently upheld by the Appeal Court on 20 April 2021. The latter Court highlighted that, in “section 298(2), parliament provided that where an application for forfeiture had been made to a Magistrates Court, the cash is to be detained until Court Proceedings are concluded. When the forfeiture by notice procedure was introduced by the 2009 Act, a similar provision was made in section 297D(5). But neither in 2002 nor in 2009, did Parliament make any amendment to section 295 to ensure that when an application is made for an Order under section 295(2), extending the period for which cash may be detained, the same kind of holding provision should apply. Parliament must, in my view therefore, be taken to have been content with the strict approach which this Court has taken in the case of Henry & Walsh to statutory powers which, though not identically worded, are not materially different”.

This decision effectively means that HMRC, or any other prosecuting authority, must not only lodge their applications for continued detention and seizure of cash within the 6-months’ time period, but such applications must also be heard within this period. If the application is not heard within the 6-months’, the Courts have no power to extend the detention any further.

The Appeal Court concluded, “I have a good deal of sympathy with HMRC on the facts of the present case. Their application was lodged with the court, as I have pointed out, just as the first national lockdown was beginning. They had no reason to believe that a hearing would be so difficult to arrange. If an extension were a matter of discretion, it might well have been exercised in their favour, but, like District Judge Green, I conclude that this is not a matter of discretion at all. I would therefore dismiss this appeal.”

This decision will have significant implications for all future cash seizure proceedings.

Rosenblatt can help

Rosenblatt has a wealth of experience in cash seizure proceedings having been instructed in relation to multi-million pound, multi-jurisdictional investigations and prosecutions brought by HM Revenue and Customs.

https://www.rosenblatt-law.co.uk/services/financial-crime/#financial-crime

Post navigation

Judicial Notice Must Be Taken of the “Childcare Disparity” Between Women and Men
Hurricane Force: A Victory for Shareholders, Big and Small

Categories

  • Articles
  • News
  • Videos

Topics

  • Banking & Finance
  • Competition & Regulatory
  • Corporate
  • Dispute Resolution
  • DLT, Cryptocurrencies and Crypto Assets
  • Employment
  • Financial Crime
  • Financial Services
  • Insolvency & Financial Restructuring
  • International Arbitration
  • Investigations
  • IP/Technology/Media
  • Real Estate
  • Tax
Rosenblatt
  • +44 (0) 20 7955 0880
  • info@rosenblatt-law.co.uk

Helpful Links

  • Anti-Modern Slavery Statement
  • Complaints Policy
  • Diversity & Equality
  • Interest
  • Pricing
  • Subscribe to our Mailing List

SRA No. 820215, authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Ce Logo
Uk Top Tier Firm 2026

Rosenblatt is a trading name of RBG Legal Services Limited, a company registered in England and Wales (with company number 13287062) and which is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under SRA No. 820215. A list of the directors of RBG Legal Services Limited, together with a list of those persons who are designated as partners of Rosenblatt, is available for inspection at the registered office of the company at 165 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2DY.

Rosenblatt uses the word “partner” to refer to a senior employee or consultant. However, Rosenblatt is not a partnership and the use of the term “partner” does not create or imply a partnership amongst or between any of its employees or consultants.

© 2025 Rosenblatt

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Website by Brighter*IR

link

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in .

Rosenblatt
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookies should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

Performance cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site.

Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!

Cookie Policy

More information about our Cookie Policy.