Rosenblatt
  • About
    • Memery Crystal
    • Investors
  • Services

    Services

    Rosenblatt is a disputes powerhouse. Competitive in the best sense, our teams provide incisive specialist expertise and collaborate closely with one another to meet our clients’ needs across the full spectrum of their activities.

    • Dispute Resolution
    • Construction, Engineering and Energy
    • Corporate Investigations
    • Debt Recovery
    • DLT, Digital Assets, and Tokenisation
    • Financial Crime
    • Financial Services
    • Insolvency & Financial Restructuring
    • International Arbitration
    • Probate & Wills
    • Serious & General Crime
    • Tax
    • Non-Contentious & Advisory
  • Insight
  • Events
  • Group Litigation
    • Amazon Legal Action
    • Property Investment Scheme Claims
    • Apple Class Action
  • Contact

Holiday pay & commission: the Court of Appeal judgment in Lock v British gas [2016]

20th October 2016

On Friday 7 October 2016, the Court of Appeal handed down the decision in British Gas Trading Limited v. Lock and Another [2016] EWCA Civ 983. As expected, the Court of Appeal followed the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision that holiday pay must include compensation for results-based commission that “ordinarily” would have been earned during periods of work. The case is important as it has potentially significant financial implications for those employers that utilise commission schemes or whose employees have remuneration packages which include additional payments that are intrinsically linked to their jobs, for example overtime payments.

Background in brief

In April 2012 Mr Lock, a salesman for British Gas, presented a claim to the Employment Tribunal. He argued that British Gas had failed to correctly calculate his holiday pay. In addition to his basic salary, Mr Lock was each month paid a sum in respect of his results-based commission. Such commission payments represented more than 60% of his remuneration and were not dependent on the amount of work that Mr Lock had done, rather the success of that work.  In Mr Lock’s case, his entitlement to commission was based on how many of the sales he negotiated which resulted in the customer purchasing British Gas’ energy products.  Although British Gas’ commission scheme was set out in a document separate to his employment contract, it was agreed that Mr Lock had a contractual right to such commission.

The European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) had previously rejected British Gas’ claim that Mr Lock’s holiday pay was comparable to his earnings during periods of work. The company had argued that his holiday pay already included both basic salary and commission payments. Whilst on leave, Mr Lock continued to receive his salary and commission relating to sales he had achieved during the weeks preceding his holiday. However, the court recognised that by taking holiday, Mr Lock’s future remuneration would be disadvantaged as, whilst on leave, he had been unable to generate any commission.  In the ECJ’s view, this might deter such a worker from taking his annual leave. The ECJ ruled that where commission is intrinsically related to the work carried out, it should be considered when calculating holiday pay.

The Court of Appeal

The key issue deliberated by the Court of Appeal (‘CoA’) was whether the UK Working Time Regulations 1998 (‘WTR’) could be interpreted to give effect to EU case law, which requires holiday pay, payable under the Working Time Directive, to include “all elements of normal pay”.  In Mr Lock’s case this would include his results-based commission. The CoA agreed with the EAT and confirmed that the WTR can (and should) be read in a way that accommodates the EU interpretation of holiday pay.

Conclusion

The CoA has therefore now determined that holiday pay must include compensation for results-based commission that would ordinarily have been earned, but for an employee taking annual leave.  The decision applies solely to those workers who have normal working hours and whose pay does not vary according to the amount of work done, rather due to the outcome of such work. It should be noted, however, that the decision to include commission in holiday pay is not intended to be applicable to staff who receive a discretionary bonus based on organisational goals or team performance.

Next steps

Although British Gas’ position is yet to be confirmed, since it has approximately 1,000 workers with potential claims, it is expected to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. However, despite the potential for appeal, employers will now be required to include relevant commission payments in any holiday pay remuneration and may face significant claims for back pay.

This article should not be taken as definitive legal advice on any of the subjects covered. 

Post navigation

Rosenblatt has acted for Direct Response Contact Centres Group Limited (“Direct Response”)
Rosenblatt has advised Simulity Labs Limited on a £4 million growth capital investment by Foresight Group

Categories

  • Articles
  • News
  • Videos

Topics

  • Banking & Finance
  • Competition & Regulatory
  • Corporate
  • Dispute Resolution
  • DLT, Cryptocurrencies and Crypto Assets
  • Employment
  • Financial Crime
  • Financial Services
  • Insolvency & Financial Restructuring
  • International Arbitration
  • Investigations
  • IP/Technology/Media
  • Real Estate
  • Tax
Rosenblatt
  • +44 (0) 20 7955 0880
  • info@rosenblatt-law.co.uk

Helpful Links

  • Anti-Modern Slavery Statement
  • Complaints Policy
  • Diversity & Equality
  • Interest
  • Pricing
  • Subscribe to our Mailing List

SRA No. 820215, authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Ce Logo
Uk Top Tier Firm 2026

Rosenblatt is a trading name of RBG Legal Services Limited, a company registered in England and Wales (with company number 13287062) and which is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under SRA No. 820215. A list of the directors of RBG Legal Services Limited, together with a list of those persons who are designated as partners of Rosenblatt, is available for inspection at the registered office of the company at 165 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2DY.

Rosenblatt uses the word “partner” to refer to a senior employee or consultant. However, Rosenblatt is not a partnership and the use of the term “partner” does not create or imply a partnership amongst or between any of its employees or consultants.

© 2025 Rosenblatt

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Website by Brighter*IR

link

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in .

Rosenblatt
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookies should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

Performance cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site.

Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!

Cookie Policy

More information about our Cookie Policy.