Rosenblatt
  • About
    • Memery Crystal
    • Investors
  • Services

    Services

    Rosenblatt is a disputes powerhouse. Competitive in the best sense, our teams provide incisive specialist expertise and collaborate closely with one another to meet our clients’ needs across the full spectrum of their activities.

    • Dispute Resolution
    • Construction, Engineering and Energy
    • Corporate Investigations
    • Debt Recovery
    • DLT, Digital Assets, and Tokenisation
    • Financial Crime
    • Financial Services
    • Insolvency & Financial Restructuring
    • International Arbitration
    • Probate & Wills
    • Serious & General Crime
    • Tax
    • Non-Contentious & Advisory
  • Insight
  • Events
  • Group Litigation
    • Amazon Legal Action
    • Property Investment Scheme Claims
    • Apple Class Action
  • Contact

The Quantum of Damages: Green v White Lantern Film

18th May 2023

The film star Eva Green was excited to play the lead in a film called ‘A Patriot’, “a horror/thriller … set within a dystopian British port city”. Her role in the $10 million production offered her “the unusual opportunity to play a soldier …” She was “particularly attracted to the messages … around climate change and migration, about which she was passionate”. Ms Green was to earn $1 million from the role, in a pay-or-play arrangement, assuring her of the fee regardless of whether or not the film was made [the ‘Artist Agreement’].

Alas, ‘A Patriot’– intended to go into production in late 2019 – did not make it to the screen, and such drama as arose from its conception played out in the High Court instead, in the case of Eva Green v White Lantern Film (Britannica) Ltd and SMC Speciality Finance LLC [2023] EWHC 930 (Ch). The judgment (as they go) is itself an exciting narrative, with characters to fill the reader’s mind with thoughts of who could play the roles in the film of the book. Of one key protagonist, Mr Justice Michael Green said, “I can see how it might be possible to take an instant dislike to him.” Having succeeded in her claim, Ms Green may be tempted to play herself should such a movie be made.

As well as drawing attention to some of the less glamorous elements of filmmaking, Green v White Lantern Film also brings into focus the legal issue of renunciation. When Ms Green sued the Defendants for payment of the $1 million fee, which remained owing despite the stop date in the Artist Agreement having passed, the Defendants counterclaimed by alleging, amongst other causes of action, that Ms Green had renounced the Artist Agreement, and so no fee was due.

This ‘species of repudiatory breach‘ of contract, albeit much rarer, arises where one party to a contract indicates a desire not to perform their obligations either before or at the time performance is required. In order to make a renunciation, the Judge explained (at paragraph 207):

“The renouncing party must evince an intention not to perform or expressly declare that they are unable to perform their obligations under the contract in some essential respect. The question whether there has been a renunciation depends on what a reasonable person in the position of the innocent party would understand from their words or conduct and the surrounding circumstances. And any such renunciatory words or conduct must be clear and unequivocal.”

What amounts to a renunciation “is highly fact-sensitive and context-specific”. It must be accepted by the innocent party. In this regard, “No particular form of acceptance [of the renunciation] is required but it must clearly and unequivocally convey to the defaulting party that the innocent party is treating the contract as terminated” (paragraph 210).

The alleged renunciation over which Green v White Lantern Film was fought involved Ms Green claiming it was “impossible” that she would be able to make the film with a new producer – the instantly dislikeable man as found by the Judge to be – and, as such, the Defendants said she did not intend to honour the Artist Agreement. Ms Green made the alleged renunciation in late September 2019, four months after the Artist Agreement was entered in to. In the intervening period, the production became seriously destabilised by funding issues, which caused a change of the personnel in control of the film. Ms Green did not want to proceed with the new producers, whom she did not trust to make a high-quality movie – it appeared from the judgment with good reason.

As at late September 2019, pre-production on ‘A Patriot‘ had still not begun, as a result of which Ms Green had not yet been contractually required to commence performance of her obligations under the Artist Agreement. Nonetheless, despite all of the problems that had since arisen, she remained excited by the project. A deal was discussed whereby Ms Green would surrender her $1 million fee in return for the rights to the script, which would enable her to make the film with the original creative team. The deal did not come to fruition, however, and all of the conflict one would expect in Act 2 of a drama led in Act 3 not to a resolution, but to yet more drama.   

In his judgment, Mr Justice Michael Green held that “… no one could sensibly have thought that [Ms Green] expressed a conclusive decision … not to perform her contractual obligations under the Artist Agreement. On the contrary, she wanted to make [A Patriot]” (paragraph 229). As such, he found that there was no renunciation, and made a declaration that Ms Green receive her $1 million fee in full, to which she was entitled under the pay-or-play arrangement aspect of the Artist Agreement.

It is rare for a relationship to fall apart before the contractual requirements upon each party commence. However, as can be seen from Green v White Lantern Film, such situations do arise, particularly if there is a longer period than anticipated between the execution of the agreement and the commencement of the contractual obligations. Parties who do not mean to renounce an agreement must ensure their actions are as clear and unequivocal as if they do mean to renounce. Indeed, there was a period in Green v White Lantern Film during which the parties pretended to progress the film, despite knowing the relationship had fallen apart, so as to avoid being in breach of the Artist Agreement. Needless to say, a party intending to renounce an agreement should take legal advice before doing so.

Ms Green has worked with Bernardo Bertolucci, Ridley Scott, Tim Burton – and of course James Bond. Fortunately, she did not need a licence to kill on this occasion. However, whether or not she found the High Court of England and Wales to be any less theatrical than the sound stages of Pinewood is a question upon which we can only speculate.

How we can help

Rosenblatt has a wealth of dispute resolution experience. For enquiries, please contact Dispute Resolution Legal Director Nick Leigh at nick.leigh@rosenblatt.co.uk.


Disclaimer: We at Rosenblatt (and our parent company RBG Holdings plc) support and encourage free/independent thinking in relation to issues which are sometimes considered to be controversial subject matters. However, the views and opinions of the authors do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, practices and policies of either Rosenblatt or RBG Holdings plc.

Post navigation

Key takeaways – April Blockchain Breakfast Briefing: Tokenisation of Real-World Assets
Piroozzadeh: The Exchange Strikes Back!

Categories

  • Articles
  • News
  • Videos

Topics

  • Banking & Finance
  • Competition & Regulatory
  • Corporate
  • Dispute Resolution
  • DLT, Cryptocurrencies and Crypto Assets
  • Employment
  • Financial Crime
  • Financial Services
  • Insolvency & Financial Restructuring
  • International Arbitration
  • Investigations
  • IP/Technology/Media
  • Real Estate
  • Tax
Rosenblatt
  • +44 (0) 20 7955 0880
  • info@rosenblatt-law.co.uk

Helpful Links

  • Anti-Modern Slavery Statement
  • Complaints Policy
  • Diversity & Equality
  • Interest
  • Pricing
  • Subscribe to our Mailing List

SRA No. 820215, authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Ce Logo
Uk Top Tier Firm 2026

Rosenblatt is a trading name of RBG Legal Services Limited, a company registered in England and Wales (with company number 13287062) and which is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under SRA No. 820215. A list of the directors of RBG Legal Services Limited, together with a list of those persons who are designated as partners of Rosenblatt, is available for inspection at the registered office of the company at 165 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2DY.

Rosenblatt uses the word “partner” to refer to a senior employee or consultant. However, Rosenblatt is not a partnership and the use of the term “partner” does not create or imply a partnership amongst or between any of its employees or consultants.

© 2025 Rosenblatt

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Website by Brighter*IR

link

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in .

Rosenblatt
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookies should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

Performance cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site.

Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!

Cookie Policy

More information about our Cookie Policy.